FS365 vs ACF50 https://bgsxr400.runboard.com/t182342 Runboard| FS365 vs ACF50 en-us Thu, 28 Mar 2024 17:16:52 +0000 Thu, 28 Mar 2024 17:16:52 +0000 https://www.runboard.com/ rssfeeds_managingeditor@runboard.com (Runboard.com RSS feeds managing editor) rssfeeds_webmaster@runboard.com (Runboard.com RSS feeds webmaster) akBBS 60 Re: FS365 vs ACF50https://bgsxr400.runboard.com/p2000012,from=rss#post2000012https://bgsxr400.runboard.com/p2000012,from=rss#post2000012Been using ACF50 the last few years, it is the best of stuff, wish I had started using it sooner nondisclosed_email@example.com (guernseyshire)Sun, 05 May 2013 22:21:21 +0000 FS365 vs ACF50https://bgsxr400.runboard.com/p1999979,from=rss#post1999979https://bgsxr400.runboard.com/p1999979,from=rss#post1999979I've been using Scottoil FS365 protective spray on the bike for the last couple of years, and on the whole been pretty pleased with the results. The only thing I've not liked is the fact that it does tend to get washed off in very wet weather - something to which you'll appreciate I have to give due consideration, given the part of the world in which I live. However, this time I've splashed out and bought a can of ACF50, a product of the aircraft industry, and you can see the difference as soon as you apply the stuff! Firstly it's not water miscible like FS365, and secondly it neutralises any corrosion. It's more expensive litre for litre than FS365 but it goes a hell of a lot further. I used a cloth to apply it over most of the bike, it spreads and penetrates incredibly well. The only places I sprayed were the engine, and parts I was unable to reach with a cloth. FS365 is probably best suited to summer use when the weather is (allegedly) drier, although I suspect I may well carry on using ACF50 from now on.nondisclosed_email@example.com (garynortheast)Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:15:05 +0000